<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NBIMS Review - NBIMS Version 1.0 – Part 1: Overview and Methodology - Comments</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;NBIMS Version 1.0 – Part 1: Overview and Methodology&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: c4.2/p73/l34</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-367</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Suggest a different wording (change in bold text):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;..., then you really cannot call what you are &lt;strong&gt;creating&lt;/strong&gt; a Building Information Model.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Merely adding &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; after &amp;quot;doing&amp;quot; is not correct grammar:  &amp;quot;..., then you really cannot call what you are doing is a Building Information Model.&amp;quot;  In simplest form it reads &amp;quot;...cannot call [_____________] is a [___BIM____].&amp;quot;  The correct form should be &amp;quot;...cannot call [____________] a [____BIM____]&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:15:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bob Huston</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 367 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>5.4-index/114-161</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-313</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Part 3 of 3&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:57:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmealy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 313 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3.1-5.3.2/45-113</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-312</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Also the Chapter headings on chapter 3.2 and 3.4 are different from all others, one is bolded and the other is a different font.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:55:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmealy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 312 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1-2.3/1-45</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some revisions that i found. quite lengthy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmealy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 311 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>c/p/l</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Need to talk about Business Case Analysis (BCA) somewhere to justify going the BIM route even if notional values are used to highlight the benfits.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:45:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 309 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>5.2/91/4</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another phase of &lt;strong&gt;Change Management&lt;/strong&gt;, needs to be included/discussed somewhere.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:42:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 308 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4.2/82/34l</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-307</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The varying levels of certification need to be defined somewhere.  This is the first instance when, &amp;quot;Minimum BIM&amp;quot; to Platinum is used w/o highlighting what that means.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:40:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 307 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4.2/75/6</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is not clear how the credit values were calculated.  Could we consider a scale of 1-100?  The minimum level is 20.1.  It is not clear what are the maximum possible points.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:38:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 306 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4.2/74/10</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-305</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Somehow minimum level needs to be defined with an example, otherwise it is very subjective.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:34:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 305 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4.2/74/1</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-304</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Suggest use &lt;strong&gt;Data Quantity&lt;/strong&gt; instead of &lt;strong&gt;Data Richness&lt;/strong&gt; as the heading.  Data richness can be misleading&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:32:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 304 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4.2/73/34</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-303</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Add &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; after doing to read as what you are doing is a Building Information Model&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:30:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 303 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3.3/62/36</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-302</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Add &amp;quot;provide&amp;quot; after also to read,&amp;quot; ...on a project will also provide a more transparent ....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:28:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 302 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>2.3/36/12</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-301</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Delete &amp;quot;The table below&amp;quot; and substitute with Figure 2.3 -1.  There is no table below.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:24:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 301 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>2.1/24/41</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-300</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Spell out SFCAM, as Shore Facilities Capital Asset Management&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:22:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 300 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>2.1/22/17</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment-299</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Add, Definition of BIM&amp;quot; or &amp;quot; What is BIM&amp;quot; as the heading  on line 16.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:19:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harry Singh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 299 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NBIMS Version 1.0 – Part 1: Overview and Methodology</title>
 <link>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1</link>
 <description>&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org/v1/p1#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:07:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3 at http://nbimsdoc.opengeospatial.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
